Monday, April 02, 2007

On Signs And Wonders: Musings On Imminence

No one shall ever accuse me of being overly apocalyptic; I do not spend my days sifting through prophecies or looking for doom, nor do I read any "Left Behind" books. I do not pore over secret texts in a windowless room. I do not stare at tea leaves. I do not consult with the dead. But I do, occasionally, look at the stars.

Perhaps you have heard of the massive storm sweeping across the "north" pole of Saturn. It has been there for many years; it has held the curiosity of physicists and astronomers for a long time. But new images from the Cassini spacecraft have brought the storm back to the fore. The picture above shows why: the heart of the storm defies (this might be too strong a word) the known laws of nature: the storm is six-sided. Though the phenomenon has been duplicated in a bucket of water spun at high speeds, a bucket of water is a contrived and controlled system: this storm on Saturn, though still in a closed system (in a sense), is occurring on a massive scale at the pole of a sphere where there are no walls, and no one is doing the spinning (I realize that the enormous, gaseous atmosphere of Saturn may, in fact, act as the cylindrical walls of a bucket along the storm's perimeter.)†

That a hexagonal storm should stop me in my tracks is doubtful, at least when it is hundreds of millions of miles away. I am sure that were I kayaking somewhere on the face of that mysterious planet, I might at least need to tighten my grip on the paddle. But it is the timing of it all that just gives me pause, and the wondrous symbolism the storm suggests.

_______________
What of the return of Christ?

It is fair to ask why I should connect the six-sided storm on Saturn as a sign of the times, a portent of things to come, or come again. Why bother? Well, partly because astronomy/astrology played no small part in a different epiphany: the Gentiles of the ancient world -- represented in the three wise men of the Christian gospel narrative -- followed starry signs and wonders to the very crib of Christ. The "Star of Bethlehem" was the sign to the Gentiles from the East that the Christ had come.

It seems possible, at least to this dreamer, that there will be a sign in the heavens signaling the return of Christ, like a different Star of Bethlehem. Jesus said in Matthew 24:30, "At that time the sign of the Son of Man will appear in the sky ..." Note what He says: the sign of the Son of Man. I know it isn't much, but it is at least intriguing.

And it is mostly intriguing because of the day and age in which we now live. Babylon, a major name in Christian apocalyptic writings, is front and center in most people's concerns for the world; Iraq, as you know, is Babylon. Persia is back on the world stage; Iran is Persia. The prophet Ezekiel prophesied (Ezekiel 38-39) a dramatic union between unlikely partners, Persia and Magog; the Magogians, at least to some observers, are the Scythians, who formerly settled the southern reaches of the old USSR. Alas, there seems ample evidence that Russia (and nations in this southern region), and Iran are recently enamored of each other; according to Ezekiel (or some suggest), their great alliance will bring war upon Israel. Granted, there is much confusion about these prophecies; some even suggest that Magog is China, but in the confusion there is much that smacks of "right now."

I do not pretend to know what these things mean; I do not even claim to believe in them. I am merely noting symbols, timing. But it is no practical joke, do you think, that Israel, no larger than Vermont (a state in America) is the epicenter of most of the world's political turmoil? How could this small place be so important; how is it that so much energy and time and living are expended on dealing with this little place? Is it not because Israel is indeed God's Chosen People, chosen above others who believe themselves much greater, much more important?

I have noticed, too, that currenly there are leaders emerging with great messianic ambitions. Iran's president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, is full of much messianic bluster, while America's Barack H. Obama, whose name means "blessed", is adoringly greeted with palm branches at every turn. (It is worth pointing out that a Chicago Tribune reporter is writing a book about Obama called, The Savior. Read about this and much more in Rolling Stones' aptly titled article about the candidate, "Destiny's Child.") Needless to say, the world is ripe with messianism: Bush and Company are destroying everything, or so it goes, and many among us are surely desperate for deliverance.

Jesus tells us that in the last days "the abomination that causes desolation" will stand in the holy place. I have more than once wondered whether the consecration of an openly and unflappable gay bishop to the Episcopal Church is a fulfillment of that prophecy: a homosexual man, unmarried yet sexually involved with a partner, is elected to stand in a Bishop's Seat as vicar of Christ. Surely there is nothing more desolate than a sexuality that cannot expand beyond itself; nor is there anything more desolate than the suggestion that Jesus Himself can be represented as a gay man by a gay man standing in His stead -- in the holy place.

Combine this all with St. Paul's warning that the last days will include a delusion on the minds of men, that men will be incapable of believing in truth, believing lies instead (lies such as whether 9/11 actually happened as we know it did); that good will be bad, and bad, good; that the many religious will have a form of godliness but deny its power; combine all of this together, and you've got something that looks undeniably au courant.

No doubt I am demonstrably wrong. I will let others do the demonstrating. I just want to do the wondering. And one of the things I cannot help but wonder about is a six-sided storm on Saturn, a storm flashing 6 sides, 6 straight sides, 6 spinning sides. It is all a wonder, and this without even thinking about who Saturn is.

Who is Saturn? Nobody really. He is just a mere Roman god, the god of the harvest, the god of reaping.

His symbol, believe it or not, is a sickle.

Peace this day.

©Bill Gnade 2007/Contratimes. All Rights Reserved.

PS. In Hindu astrology, Saturn, or Shani, is the Judge of all the planets (see Wikipedia entry for Saturn).

†Saturn does not have a uniform rotational speed; it is irregular. Perhaps this explains the strange geometry of the storm. But every sphere I've ever spun that spun irregularly was either warped or bubbled; each sphere's center of mass was not centered. Is Saturn poised to wobble apart? Just wondering. Also, as my son pointed out, the water in the rotating bucket has a hole in the middle in the shape of a hexagon. The storm, as you can see, has no eye wall; there is no hole.

[Photo courtesy of NASA. Click image for a larger view.]

"So when you see standing in the holy place 'the abomination that causes desolation,' spoken of through the prophet Daniel—let the reader understand— then let those who are in Judea flee to the mountains."

13 comments:

Anonymous said...

You've really set my mind spinning with this entry. I'm already praying as fast as I can this world and have trouble concentrating on everything else. God bless.

Bill Gnade said...

Well, Mary B., my apologies for adding to all the spinning.

It is pretty cool, though, don't you think?

But we need not fret too much about the signs as long as we fully trust the God Who is in charge.

Peace.

BG

Barry Pike said...

Very interesting. The tiresome hyperbole of the obligatory sideswipe at our President notwithstanding, this is a really thoughtful and observant post.

Even though I had read with puzzled interest about the hexagonal storm on Saturn, I had not even considered the Star of David, nor any of the other insightful connections that you have drawn.

Cool. "Come quickly, Lord."

Bill Gnade said...

Dear Mr. Pike,

I appreciate your visit, and your comments. At the very least, it is all pretty cool.

But I have but one bone to pick. Perhaps it is my fault, perhaps I could have made myself clearer. The "obligatory sideswipe" of the President is not what you think. Read again: I am suggesting that those who long for an earthly, political messiah are precisely those folks given to Bush-bashing mythologies. I am not a Bush-basher; and while this does not necessarily make me a fan of President Bush, it does make me defend him against the many gross, absurd and obscene (and irrational) charges leveled at him.

Does this make sense?

Anyhow, do come back, and I apologize for letting you think a thought I did not intend. My fault as a writer, no doubt. I will amend the essay presently.

Peace to you,

BG

Bill Gnade said...

Dear Mr. Pike, again:

I should have written that I will EMEND the post, which I have done. I hope that my meaning is now clearer.

If you are interested in how I have defended (for want of a better word) President Bush from unfair, gratuitous and absurd criticisms, you might find this interesting, or this. There is also this , this and even this.

And then there's ...

Blessings!

BG

Anonymous said...

A little additional food for thought: In the last days, people will say, "there is the Christ" or "He is here." Don't be deceived.

Given the apocalyptic pronouncements of our former vice president, and his obvious desire to cloth himself in the robes of a messiah of sorts, one wonders whether all of these dots warrant some sort of connection.

Barry Pike said...

I am humbled by the graciousness of your response to my comment. And I am pleased to stand corrected.

I am certain that if I had been familiar with some of your previous writings I would not have mistaken irony for vitriol. I am truly sorry about that. As I read through some of the posts you recommended I find only more and more sound, well-reasoned thinking and excellent writing.

Your description of Maureen Dowd, in particular, is truly artful. I wish I had written this sentence, “She is to literacy what phone sex is to oratory.” That is as close to a perfectly apt metaphor as I ever expect to see.

I am pleased to make your acquaintance.

Blessings to you and yours.

Bill Gnade said...

Dear Mr. Pike,

I am glad that you took my remarks as they were intended. I know that my initial post was a little vague; I am glad that your (mis)understanding of the passage led me to make the proper change.

You know, I have written so much here (too much, really) that I had forgotten about the Maureen Dowd metaphor. Thanks for spotting it, thanks for liking it. I am glad you pulled it out, for it makes me laugh. Seriously, this is again one of those moments when I sit back and ask, "Did I write that? No stinkin' way!!"

It had to have been an accident.

(Perhaps the line will make it into a future edition of Bartlett's.)

Peace to you, and I am glad to meet you as well.

BG

LukeBuckham said...

Bill--

"Surely there is nothing more desolate than a sexuality that cannot expand beyond itself"

Very dramatic. Do you feel the same way about a man-woman couple who cannot reproduce? Is their relationship so dramatically "desolate"?

Don't YOU believe that every person will exist forever?

Perhaps this is unfair of me to say, but here it is: I think you place too much importance on child production.

Luke

LukeBuckham said...

By the way, I've been excited about the storm on Saturn. I simply love this stuff. I love all things astronomical & celestial; I've been pouring over images of space since I was a little boy.

And allow me to recommend an excellent book which I recently read: 'The End of Days:
Fundamentalism and the Struggle for the Temple Mount' by Gershom Gorenberg. It is brilliant for several reasons, but the reason I mention it here is this: it brilliantly captures how religious people from all 3 big monotheisms are MAKING their favorite prophecies come true. This does not apply to Saturn's storm, of course (though it does affect how people view it as a "sign in the heavens"), but it does apply to the situation in the Middle East; in other words, it concerns our future.

And allow me to elaborate on my first comment here: I think that the reason you describe "a sexuality that cannot expand beyond itself" so grimly is that you don't believe that two men can experience a healthy love for one another in the manner which Eugene Robinson & his partner are doing.

If you did, you would acknowledge that childbirth is not the only evidence of fruitfulness in this world; that loves radiates, that it spreads fecundity of all kinds everywhere it goes, whether or not children are being constantly squirted into existence as a result.

Luke

Bill Gnade said...

Luke,

You raise a very interesting point. Would it surprise you if I said that I have already (elsewhere) responded to your challenge?

Let me think for a while whether I should post my thoughts on the issues you raise. Perhaps if there are enough people who prod and cajole, well, maybe then.

In the meantime, know that there is a thoughtful reply hovering over these keys.

Blessings,

Gnade

LukeBuckham said...

Bill--

Of course, when I said this:

"If you did, you would acknowledge that childbirth is not the only evidence of fruitfulness in this world; that loves radiates, that it spreads fecundity of all kinds everywhere it goes, whether or not children are being constantly squirted into existence as a result."

I was referring to the article, not your entire existence. Surely you acknowledge what I've just written elsewhere, in some way, even if you come at it from a radicaly different angle than mine.

(peace?)

Luke

Fr Longenecker said...

I wish I had kept the recent newspaper article that said the Jews had established a new Sanhedrin in Jerusalem to begin again the sacrificial system of worship at the Wailing Wall...