Wednesday, September 03, 2008

Abusing Sarah Palin With Metaphor

Twice this week I've warned the Democratic Party about the dangers of overplaying the Sarah Palin attack strategy. I even invoked a sports metaphor, the very same (and rather lame) metaphor I invoked on the eve of Democratic Party victories in 2006. I warned them of the "offsides trap," a defensive play in soccer (or European football). Not that anyone is listening, but I at least try to sound the alarm.

I find it interesting that tonight on the "The Factor" with Bill O'Reilly, Dick Morris used a metaphor of similar import drawn from military history: he warned Democrats that Sarah Palin could end up being the Democratic Party's Battle of Kursk; that battle was a trap for Germany, used to great success by the Soviet Union in World War 2. I like Morris' metaphor only to a point, as it is hard for me to even remotely hint at sympathy towards the repugnant Hitler (or the Soviet Union's Stalin, for that matter).

My warning, of course, was aimed at Democrats and all those in the media who support the Democratic Party. It was intended to point out the perils of crossing a particular line, albeit a moving one. A quick survey of the media largely confirms my suspicion that Democrats have already crossed that line with a series of abusive metaphors (in bold):
  • The ever-imitable New York Times columnist Maureen Dowd opined Sunday that Sarah Palin is essentially a real-life "chic flick." In all fairness to Ms. Dowd, who is to literature what phone sex is to oratory, a direct quote should be offered: Sarah Palin's story is a "hokey chick flick [that] came out on the trail, a Cinderella story so preposterous it’s hard to believe it’s not premiering on Lifetime." (My wife perfectly sums up what is wrong with Ms. Dowd: Ms. Dowd's words are born solely of envy.)
  • Ersatz comedian Bill Maher essentially referred to Sarah Palin as John McCain's stewardess. (That's some pretty heady humor there, Bill. Great writing.)
  • Washington Post columnist Sally Quinn believes "that a woman with five children, including one with special needs, and a daughter who is a 17-year-old child who is pregnant and about to have a baby, probably has got to rethink her priorities. It seems to me that there is a tipping point, and I think that she's crossed the tipping point." (Ms. Quinn might want to quietly meditate on her tipping point for a while.)
  • Democratic strategist and linguist/philosopher George Lakoff said of the Sarah Palin story, "It's conceivable a 17-year-old girl just screwed the GOP." (Of course, it should behoove any decent linguist to properly ask himself what he intends by "conceivable" and "screwed." Nice metaphors, Mr. Lakoff. I can see why you are a Democratic strategist.)
What is just thrilling good fun is to watch closely whether Gov. Palin can sufficiently tap into her own poetic muse to find the apt metaphor that both perfectly fits the expectations of the American psyche (at least a majority share of it), and also gives Mr. Lakoff fits of apoplexy (figuratively speaking, of course). Tonight, right now in fact, is her time to be particularly inspired. That is if she's not too tired from breast-feeding. (Sorry. See how easy it is to be a buffoon?)

©Contratimes/2008. All Rights Reserved.

5 comments:

Chris Wilson said...

Bill,

I got a good kick out of all the wound licking going around on MSNBC. I tuned in to Keith Oberman, and Chris Matthews was chairing a round table and I was struck by all the whiney comments about how "sarcastic" she was and how she was attacking the media. For the last couple of weeks we've seen these talking vultures circling Mrs Palin looking for the least sign of loose flesh to get their crusty beaks into and what we got last night after a fine tongue lashing by the comely Mrs Palin, was a bunch of squawking about missing tail feathers.

I stand by my comments about her priorities, but aside from that, she is sure fun to watch.

Peace,

Chris

T.C. said...

Yeah, what intellectual depravity. The problem with all these people is that they misuse their intelligence.

Articulate rhetoric doesn't mean you're smart.

That's the biggest pit fall of such people: The over rate themselves.

That's why they're always off side as you put it. Of course, Bill, they complain about every call to the referee.

Bill Gnade said...

Chris,

Lots of metaphors! Vultures, crusty beaks, missing tail feathers -- I love it! Thanks for making me laugh as you make your points.

Bliss!

BG

Bill Gnade said...

Dear Commentator,

Yes, yes! Blame the ref! How true.

Peace.

BG

T.C. said...

...though some refs, I must add, are clearly insane.

Heh.