Monday, August 16, 2010

On Knots And Faith Untying

As a mere child, C. S. Lewis lost his faith in God and the whole of the Christian story. There were several reasons for this, all of which he describes in his lovely autobiography Surprised By Joy. But one reason particularly speaks to me; it is indeed the only thing I share in common with the young Mr. Lewis. In short, Mr. Lewis came to believe the universe was thwarting his simplest ambitions. He describes the cosmos' stubborn resistance as one of the "seeds of pessimism" that found fertile soil in his mind, a pessimism that grew till he became "an apostate, dropping my faith with no sense of loss but with the greatest relief." Permit me to quote Mr. Lewis at length:

As to the sources of my pessimism ... I am now inclined to think that the seeds of pessimism were sown before my mother's death. Ridiculous as it may sound, I believe that the clumsiness of my hands [Lewis and his brother were both born missing the first joints in their thumbs. -- Ed.] was at the root of the matter. How could this be? Not, certainly, that a child says, "I can't cut a straight line with a pair of scissors, therefore the universe is evil." Childhood has no such power of generalization and is not (to do it justice) so silly. Nor did my clumsiness produce what is ordinarily called an Inferiority Complex. I was not comparing myself with other boys; my defeats occurred in solitude. What they really bred in me was a deep (and, of course, inarticulate) sense of resistance or opposition on the part of inanimate things. Even that makes it too abstract and adult. Perhaps I had better call it a settled expectation that everything would do what you did not want it to do. Whatever you wanted to remain straight, would bend; whatever you tried to bend would fly back to the straight; all knots which you wished to be firm would come untied; all knots you wanted to untie would remain firm.

It is important to note that Mr. Lewis does not argue his public life was thwarted by the body politic or by his family. He does not suggest teachers inhibited his creative progress or some nemesis intimidated him to such a degree he fell back in retreat. Instead, what Mr. Lewis tells us is that this sense of "resistance or opposition on the part of inanimate things ... occurred in solitude." [emphasis mine] He was privately thwarted; when alone, he felt that something stood against him.

I said above that this is the only thing Mr. Lewis and I share in common, but even this commonality is distinguished in two ways. First, I do not conclude, as Mr. Lewis seems to, that the universe is poorly designed (he playfully refers to his accepting the "Argument from Undesign" as the strongest argument for atheism). I do not conclude that either the universe or God is deficient, but that I am. My inabilities and limitations tempt me to self-condemnation: I should be better; I am not good enough. Second, my pessimism is unlike Mr. Lewis' not only because mine is directed inward, but because it is something I have not outgrown. He would describe, or so I bet, his pessimism as rather adolescent. I am sure he would even see it as part of his adolescent "passion" or "lust" for the Occult. I am sure he discovered in himself a naïveté, formed in the imaginative play common to boys in solitude, that the universe was a magical place where young boys could attain mastery ("maistry", as Lewis suggests) as magicians, wizards, knights. In fact, I am quite confident he did discover that very thing, at least unconsciously, and that he would agree with what I've just written.

I, too, accepted this view of myself as a boy. I expected great things, even superpowers, of myself. In solitude I believed my knots would hold and that my aim was straight. I recall even believing I could will by sheer force of mind a heavy snowstorm resulting in a "snow day" in which school was canceled. Child that I was, there was just enough success to reinforce my illusions and just enough failure to ensure I'd delude myself that willpower and pride could attain perfection.

Interestingly, when I became a Christian; when I fully poured myself into the Faith, I brought with me this sense of the superman. Maybe it was not so much a sense of being a superman as it was of being a super sage, a sort of Christian wizard. I would attain and achieve. I would prosper. I would possess "maistry." Indeed, I really did believe that I could attain a level of spiritual invincibility where God -- my benevolent Father -- and my deep faith in His benevolence, could clear a path for my faithful feet broader than the dry lands the Israelites marched upon through the parted Red Sea.

And somehow, as St. Paul might argue, sin seized an opportunity. The fruits of faith for me began to turn sour. When thwarted I abused myself. When I stumbled I became my greatest scold. Pride cast its aspersions: What sort of fool have you become? This struggle is beneath you, you worthless clod. Look at how you flounder. Look at how others do not. See with what ease they live their lives? But you. You disgrace me.

This is not God or the universe speaking so unlovingly. It is my own soul. God is not shaking His head or wagging His finger. The universe is not out to get me; it is not, as Mr. Lewis suggested, "a menacing and unfriendly place." I am out to get me; I am an unfriendly place to myself.

I shall follow this installment of Contratimes with a tale of a knot. I intend to share this tale tomorrow. It is a fine tale about an extraordinary knot and the moment of atheism such a marvelous knot inspired. Of course I may not get to my tale as planned, since plans, especially as summer wanes, have a way of changing. But the hope is there, and where there is hope, well, there is everything.

Peace.

Part II begins here.


©2010/All Rights Reserved. 


Thursday, August 12, 2010

Let Others Speak 8.12.10

"Maturity: among other things -- not to hide one's strength out of fear and, consequently, live below one's best." -- Dag Hammarskjöld, Markings

Wednesday, August 11, 2010

Let Others Speak 8.11.10: On Faith

"Below even the sunniest and most secure human relationship, the abyss lies waiting -- because our lack of faith is fascinated by the possibilities of the night side of life." -- Dag Hammarskjöld, Markings

Tuesday, August 10, 2010

Let Others Speak: On Irony

"Where did all the irony come from? What pole sent this glacier that has pinned modern culture under its massive arrogance? Irony asserts implicitly that you are superior to the thing you are ironizing over, or to its maker. Ordinarily it is a useful, important color in our emotional paintboxes. But when we paint everything this color, its character changes. Irony is quintessentially the attitude of someone at a dinner party who wants you to know that he can't leave but would rather be anyplace else. The educated elite of America and the West have been feeling mighty ironical ever since the cultural revolution: They have denounced and forsworn Western culture but never had any intention of leaving the table while the feed was underway. So they have had to settle for letting everyone know how much smarter they are than the other guests, how little they are enjoying themselves, and how superior they are to the culture they themselves superintend. ...

"What did we accomplish in that great cultural revolution that created the new ice age, the Sterile Age, the Age of Irony? We manfully whacked down virginity and, crashing to earth while we celebrated it, crushed the idea of purity in the mud. And then we toppled art, which fell backwards and smashed sanctity to splinters. And then spitting on our hands we shouldered loveless sex and paraded it in triumph, which had the unplanned consequence of exalting sterility and grinding out passion among the cigarette butts. And our dry ironic laughter, which has always been joyless, has come to sound like labored breathing on a deathbed." [emphasis mine] -- David Gelernter, "Dead in the Water"

Monday, August 09, 2010

Let Others Speak 8.9.10

"The flat soul is what the sexual wisdom of our time conspires to make universal... Are we lovers anymore?" -- Allan Bloom, The Closing of the American Mind

I Bid You...

A Happy 8.9.10!

Sunday, August 08, 2010

Freed Believers (In Chains)

[What follows was written in early July. I did not publish it then. In fact, I forgot all about it until I spotted it in my queue of un-posted work just a few minutes ago. I present it as is, unfinished. -- Ed.]

OK. So you've had a hard faith. You were raised in a tough church. Your conception of God was all wrong. You've been living under a cloud of fear, judgment, wrath. You were told the gospel was free, full of grace, and then you were told to follow a bunch of rules. You followed those rules; you swallowed the idea that grace was a legal term. You fell short -- always. You could not live up to expectations. You failed to gain mastery and the plaudits such mastery allegedly merits.

And now you're wounded -- and mad.

I went this morning to the "Free Believers Network," a website for the disheartened who still have faith; for the disenfranchised who still want to belong. Those who find their way to FBN are greeted with this:

We are a growing network of Christians committed to returning Christianity to its natural habitat. As you browse through this site, open your heart; ask yourself one question: What if?
I can't resist: What does Christianity's natural habitat look like? Does it look at all like a web-based social network? Is that Christianity's natural habitat?

Perhaps you are not like me. Perhaps you'd like to see Christianity return to its roots, its roots in the dust of Palestine, watered by the Spirit under the brutal sun of Roman occupation. Maybe you believe this is the period of Christianity at its purest, its most authentic.

I, however, do not hold such a time in high regard. I am not one to wish for Roman occupation, nor am I one to romanticize walking about in sandals, with a tunic, a staff; a donkey for a friend. But many of my more "emergent church-type" peers strike me as longing for the "old ways," ways, if they just thought about it, that would be lived without any scriptures at all (the early church almost exclusively drew from a comprehensive and beloved oral tradition). The early church, formed in the natural habitat of Palestine under Roman tyranny, was rife with power struggles, idolatry, apostasy, heresy, sexual immorality and corruption.

In short, the natural habitat of Christianity is like any other time or place. Indeed, it IS any time or place.

But note that the faithful at FBN believe something I don't. They believe they know not only where the true habitat of Christianity is, they know where it is not, and they can lead us from the artificial habitat in which Christianity is largely lived today to the real, authentic, genuine habitat that was lost, abandoned, rejected.

They are wrong. 


©2010. All Rights Reserved. 

Saturday, August 07, 2010

Let Others Speak 8.7.10

"Rebellion for me is articulating my views, trying to be honest about what I see. I don't think a lot of people in the public arena do that ..." -- Michelle Obama, Vogue interview (2007)

[Indeed.]

Thursday, August 05, 2010

Let Others Speak 8.5.10

"When citizens do act in their public selves as though their faith matters, they risk not only ridicule, but actual punishment." -- Stephen Carter, The Culture of Disbelief 

Wednesday, August 04, 2010

Let Others Speak, Part 2 8.4.10

"Christianity has not been tried and found wanting; it has been found difficult and not tried." -- G. K. Chesterton

Anne Rice Was A Christian? Who Knew?

I guess in certain circles, really small circles, the big news is that author Anne Rice has "quit being a Christian." Her thoughtful announcement was tactfully posted on her Facebook page, which, apparently, is in accordance with the rigid expectations of the newest decorum. 

Admittedly the circle in which I exist is even smaller than I thought. Ms. Rice has "quit being a Christian"? I had no idea she had even started playing. 

What, pray tell, will the Church do now? Maybe Bono can stand in the gap. 

©2010/All Rights Reserved. 

Let Others Speak 8.4.10

"Postmodernism opens with the sense of irrevocable loss and incurable fault -- a death that 'begins' with the death of God and 'ends' with the death of ourselves. We are in a time between times and a 'place which is no place.'" -- Mark C. Taylor, Erring: A Postmodern A/Theology

Tuesday, August 03, 2010

Let Others Speak 8.3.10

"Are we by nature fated to suppress the deepest we know lest we offend?" -- Charles Malik, A Christian Critique of the University 

Monday, August 02, 2010

More Shameless Promotion

Contratimes' more religiously-inclined readers must not forget to check out Shallow Church, a new venture in faith. 

The Democracy Of Din

"Contratimes will continue, I believe, but its days of political commentary are over. ... The only time I will write of such things (i.e., political, economic, etc.) is if I believe they speak to our dangerous habit of idolatry." -- BG

Walking into a bookstore often gives me a headache, especially if I actually walk into it. Ouch. I should really look up.

My pain is generally the result of too many stimuli, of information overload. There is so much crying out for attention in a bookstore; there is hardly a book section that is silent. Over there are the Narcissists: Read about me! Along the brick wall are the Alarmists: All hell is imminent! By the side window one finds the Sensualists and the Aesthetes catalogued in the Boasters section: Look at what we love, so beautiful! On this table one finds the Soothers -- We are at peace! -- tucked in with the Comforters -- We know peace and success and we can give them to you! On the back wall is a large section of Namers and Solvers of Problems: We have answers! Near the café one finds the Deeply Reflective and Trenchantly Analytical: We just know! Not too far away one finds the Peregrinators, all telling me where they've been, with some even telling me where to go. In the middle one finds shelves covered with books written by Epicureans filled with good taste: Check out our palates! Adjacent are the Luxuriant bidding me to look between -- and beneath -- their covers; and to the right, the Exalted: Check out my palace!

Near the lavatory wall one finds Exterior Decorators shouting that an outside makeover can revive your insides; while the Interior Decorators insist, at least some of them, that if you feel good about your insides, your outsides will shine too (and even a few Really Good Interiorists denounce the outsides as so much sexist vanity). Near the red couches one hears the clatter emanating from racks full of the Analgesics, Depressants and Stimulants, all promising escapes and romps and fantasies and dramas and adventures, and sundry tours de force: We won't waste your precious time; we'll take you away from the dulness of your life! 

It's no wonder I get a headache.

And the same goes for TV, newspapers, the internet; blogging. My headaches come from all the shouting, beckoning, pleading: Give us your attention! Achtung!

I wonder, really, if it is ultimately a good thing there is a "new media." The term, of course, is misleading: the newness refers not to the quality of media but the quantity. There have never been so many voices and so many vendors seeking attention, dispensing "information."

What happens, do you think, when we can't really get away, not just from the Culture of Dissemination and Marketing and Opinion and News, but from the Culture of Consuming? I know that if I hear somewhere that X is the rage, and that, upon further inquiry I learn to like X; and that if, in liking X, I begin to note that everywhere I turn X, or some X spinoff or derivative,  is being discussed, analyzed and prodded to death; and if I notice that from TV to blogs to books to comedy routines to art to music to conversations on the street and arguments at a dinner party X in all its forms is inescapable, I discover I not only hate X, I pretty much hate everybody else too. I get sick of X, and, in the process, I get sick of everything associated with X: electronic media, books, dinner parties, concerts, newspapers.

Satiety is often a dangerous, vile thing. It seems that if one wanted to rule the world the best thing to happen would be the creation of MANY VOICES, of a TRULY DEMOCRATIC MEDIUM, like the "new media." For where there are many voices, there is cacophony, chaos. The New Democratic Medium begets tedium, and tedium leads to satiety, fatigue, indifference; to ennui. Everything is lost in the din of either/or, of this or that; in an endless flow of example, counterexample; in a ceaseless rhythm of "exceptions." Some people can withstand this onslaught and are immune to its effects. They exalt in chatter, gossip, opinion; the sowing of "clarity" and discord. They adore the political idols; for many the political is their idol. But others are not so stalwart. They crumble or wither, or just get distended and bloated and bent out of shape, sated to the point of discomfort, even sleep. They've had too much. They actively consume themselves into passivity, requiring that they lie down, take a nap. 

It may not be the suppression of voices that ruins the world, that leads to tyranny. It may be this exalted and celebrated plethora of voices that results in most voices shutting down. Let everyone speak at once in order to silence as many voices as possible: Let's give them a headache so that they may walk away. 

Let's give them more than they can handle. Perhaps that way they will let us handle even more.

Peace.

©2010/All Rights Reserved.

Let Others Speak 8.2.10

"The great illusion of leadership is to think that others can be led out of the desert by someone who has never been there." -- Henri Nouwen, The Road To Daybreak